ArticleJournal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)
Retrospective Evaluation of Prognostic Variables and Overall Survival Associated With Nonketotic Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemia in Diabetic Cats: 29 Cases (2000-2020).
Article in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retrospective Evaluation of Prognostic Variables and Overall Survival Associated With Nonketotic Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemia in Diabetic Cats: 29 Cases (2000-2020).Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare survival between cats diagnosed with a nonketotic hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS) and cats diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and to determine whether clinical parameters, clinicopathologic data, and insulin type are associated with survival. Secondary objectives were to evaluate whether these parameters were associated with survival in cats undergoing a generalized hyperglycemic diabetic crisis.
designRetrospective evaluation of medical records of cats diagnosed with DKA and HHS between 2000 and 2020.
settingUniversity teaching hospital. ANIMALS: The HHS group consisted of 29 cats (blood glucose concentration [BG] ≥31.08 mmol/L [≥560 mg/dL]; calculated serum osmolality ≥350 mOsm/kg; ketone negative). The DKA group consisted of 71 cats (BG ≥7.77 mmol/L [≥140 mg/dL]; pH <7.35; ketone positive).
interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsNo clinicopathologic parameters or previous use of glargine U-100 were significantly associated with survival in the HHS group. There was no difference in survival of the HHS group versus the DKA group (65.5% vs. 68.6%; p = 0.85). In all cats, higher serum BUN (p = 0.014), creatinine (p = 0.0098), or BG (p = 0.015) and lower serum sodium concentration (p = 0.03) or body temperature (p = 0.0098) were associated with decreased odds of survival. Calculated total and effective osmolalities were not associated with survival in either group.
conclusionsCats with HHS had a survival of 65.5% in this study. No serum biochemical parameters predicted prognosis for the HHS group, and insulin type was not found to be associated with survival. Azotemia, hyponatremia, hyperglycemia, and hypothermia were associated with decreased survival when combining all cats. Hyperosmolality was not associated with survival; therefore, distinguishing HHS and DKA into separate syndromes may be arbitrary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.