ArticlePloS one2025
Hip, knee, and ankle joint forces during exoskeletal-assisted walking: Comparison of approaches to simulate human-robot interactions.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simulation study of exoskeleton-musculoskeletal coupling for exoskeleton assistance via multi-agent reinforcement learning.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Smart exoskeleton-assisted rehabilitation after fracture surgery: closed-loop control, personalized load management, and integrated telemonitoring.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The overall goal of this study was to develop a computational framework to quantify hip, knee, and ankle joint forces during exoskeletal-assisted walking (EAW) in the ReWalk P6.0, an FDA-approved lower-extremity exoskeleton. The first objective was to quantify hip, knee, and ankle joint forces during unassisted walking and compare the results to existing in vivo and simulation data. The second objective was to compute hip, knee, and ankle joint forces from four different approaches to simulate human-robot interactions during EAW. We recorded the three-dimensional motion of one able-bodied participant during unassisted walking and EAW, with simultaneous measurements of (i) marker trajectories, (ii) ground reaction forces, (iii) electromyography, and (iv) exoskeleton encoder data. We developed a subject-specific virtual simulator in OpenSim to reproduce unassisted walking and EAW. Next, we utilized OpenSim's extension, OpenSim Moco, to determine the joint reaction forces at the hips, knees, and ankles during unassisted walking and EAW. The computed peak hip, knee, and ankle joint compressive forces during unassisted walking were 3.42-3.82 body weight (BW), 3.10-3.48 BW, and 4.97-5.83 BW, respectively; these joint forces were comparable to prior in vivo and simulation results. The four approaches to simulate human-robot interactions during EAW resulted in peak compressive forces ranging from 2.98-4.66 BW, 2.82-5.83 BW, and 3.39-3.79 BW at the hip, knee, and ankle joints, respectively. This computational framework provides a low-risk and cost-effective technique to quantify the loading of the long bones and assess fracture risk during EAW in patients with severe bone loss in the lower extremities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.