ArticlePloS one2025
A real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) events for Definity.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone use and glaucoma risk: pharmacovigilance analysis and nationwide cohort study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDefinity significantly enhances the diagnostic accuracy of echocardiography but raises ongoing safety concerns. This study aimed to explore potential adverse events (AEs) associated with Definity in real-world settings by analyzing data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
methodsWe retrospectively extracted AE reports from the FAERS database between 2004 and the first quarter of 2024. Disproportionality analyses using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) were conducted to identify signals potentially associated with Definity. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed as sensitivity analyses to assess potential risk factors for Definity-related AEs.
resultsA total of 4460 reports with Definity as the "primary suspected" drug were included. We identified 104 statistically significant signals at PT level, including common AEs such as back pain and muscle spasms, as well as exploratory signals not listed on the drug label, such as eye movement disorder and renal pain. It is noteworthy that 21 signals did not retain significance following Bonferroni correction. These AEs spanned 25 System Organ Classes (SOCs). In reports with available time-to-onset data, most events occurred within 30 days of administration, while some were reported at longer intervals. Moreover, logistic regression analysis indicated that both gender and body weight were independent risk factors associated with Definity-related AE.
conclusionThis study provides exploratory insights into potential AEs associated with Definity based on real-world pharmacovigilance data. While most signals are consistent with known safety profiles, several emerging signals warrant further investigation and clinical awareness. These findings may contribute to ongoing risk management and pharmacovigilance efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.