ArticlePloS one2025
Assessing fecal pollution source in a Northern Michigan Lake using qPCR and a community-based monitoring framework.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implementing quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) within a community-based research framework expands the scope and scale of community-driven monitoring and research efforts. The increasing accessibility of qPCR technology and methodology has allowed the incorporation of community partners in numerous ways, ranging from sample collection to running qPCR tests. Here, we report on a community-driven study at Crystal Lake in Beulah, MI, in which qPCR was demonstrated to be a more valuable water testing technique than culture-based methods. Historically high levels of the enteric bacteria Escherichia coli in the inlet to Crystal Lake, Cold Creek, as measured by culture-based testing methods, spurred an interest in understanding more about fecal pollution and its source. In this study, we monitored 17 sites in Cold Creek and around Crystal Lake throughout the summers of 2020 and 2021 and used qPCR to assess levels of Enterococcus while source-tracking all samples for human, dog, and Canada goose fecal markers (HF183, DG3 and CG0F1-Bac, respectively). Replicate samples were sent for E. coli culture-based testing. Results showed high fecal contamination (E. coli and Enterococcus) and consistent HF183, DG3 and CG0F1-Bac-positive samples at specific sample sites. Varying degrees of relatedness were found between Enterococcus levels grouped by precipitation amount. Due to the nature of the sampling sites, we hypothesize that human fecal contamination is due to stormwater outflows and septic system influences and not direct human contact with the water. A Cohen's Kappa analysis between the Enterococcus qPCR test results and E. coli culture-based test results indicated a moderately positive relationship. The historical E. coli dataset, now accompanied by the Enterococcus, HF183, DG3 and CG0F1-Bac data, confirms consistent and elevated levels of fecal pollution in Cold Creek and Crystal Lake that is likely related to human sources with stormwater outflows being a contributor to this contamination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.