ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Nurturing hope in Rwandan healthcare settings: Exploring factors that influence hope among healthcare providers, pregnant women, and mothers with children under five years.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to the World Health Organization, inadequate antenatal care increases risks for both mothers and children, many of which can be prevented through regular screening, timely treatment, and adoption of healthy behaviors. Evidence suggests that healthcare recipients (HCRs) who receive quality care tend to be more hopeful and engaged in their care, while hope among healthcare providers (HCPs) can reduce burnout and enhance their ability to deliver quality services. This study explores the role of hope in healthcare delivery among HCRs and HCPs in rural Northern Rwanda, focusing on three key dimensions of hope: interconnectedness, readiness for change, and future orientation. Using a qualitative design, the research draws on focus group discussions and key informant interviews. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify key factors influencing hope and to generate recommendations for embedding hope in healthcare at individual, interpersonal, and health system levels. The analysis mapped a quadruple of areas serving as both facilitators and barriers of hope; relationships, care experiences, continuous learning, and working conditions. Respectful communication by HCPs fostered trust and positively influenced HCRs' engagement. Faith, learning opportunities, and positive health system encounters supported future orientation and confidence. While HCPs showed strong commitment to care, their motivation was often challenged by resource constraints and poor working environments. The study highlights the importance of aligning quality care strategies with factors that promote hope. Strengthening relational care, promoting continuous learning, and improving work conditions can foster a more hopeful and resilient health system. Prioritizing such approaches can enhance both patient engagement and provider well-being across primary care settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.