ArticlePloS one2025
Modelling of strategies for the introduction and routine use of multivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccines (MMCVs) in the African meningitis belt.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of MenAfriVac has significantly reduced group A meningococcal meningitis in the African meningitis belt, but epidemics caused by other groups such as C, W, Y and X (MenCWYX) remain a threat. To address this, a new multivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MMCV) has been developed and pre-qualified by WHO. This study extends a previously established transmission dynamic model for MenA to include MenCWYX, enabling evaluation of the potential impact of MMCVs under various vaccination strategies. Using Burkina Faso as a case study, the model simulates mass campaigns targeting different age groups and routine vaccination through the Essential Programme on Immunization (EPI). The results indicate that campaigns targeting 1-29-year-olds are most effective in averting cases and delaying disease resurgence, while 1-19-year-old campaigns offer a resource-efficient alternative. Vaccine efficacy against carriage and the duration of protection significantly influence outcomes; greater efficacy (90% vs. 60%) and longer protection delay resurgence and reduce the number of cases. Routine- only vaccination demonstrates value in lower-risk settings, though it is less effective than combined strategies. Sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of the ranking of strategies but highlight the importance of accurate estimates of vaccine efficacy and transmission parameters. The findings suggest that countries in the meningitis belt should integrate MMCVs into their immunisation programs, with high-risk countries prioritising catch-up campaigns for children and young adults. Despite data limitations and uncertainties, this model provides valuable insights for optimising vaccine rollout and highlights critical research needs, such as understanding vaccine effectiveness against carriage. These results support informed decision-making to sustain progress against meningitis and protect populations from future epidemics. MMCVs hold great promise in further reducing meningitis burden and approaching disease elimination in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.