ArticlePloS one2025
The prevalence and correlates of obstructive lung disease among adults aged 45 and above in India: Findings from the longitudinal aging study in India.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among Indian adults: systematic review and meta‑analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite its high disease burden, few existing estimates of the prevalence of obstructive lung disease in India are based on high-quality data sources. To our knowledge, prior studies at the national level have not included objective measurements of lung function. The Longitudinal Aging Study in India administered spirometry to adults 45 years and older (N = 31,103). We estimated inverse probability weights to account for sample selection processes and quantified the prevalence of obstructive lung disease overall and by region, age, and gender. We investigated the overlap among objective rates of obstructive lung disease, respiratory symptoms, and self-reported diagnoses. Additionally, we evaluated associations between obstructive lung disease and pertinent risk factors. The overall prevalence of obstructive lung disease was 14.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.4-15.4). Prevalence was higher among men than women (p < 0.001) and increased with age (p < 0.001). Disease awareness was low, with only 12.0% (95% CI 9.9-14.5) of men and 11.0% (95% CI 8.6-14.0) of women with obstructive lung disease reporting prior diagnoses of lung disease. We observed heterogeneity by region (p < 0.001), which largely remained after accounting for differences in demographic and risk factors. High prevalence and low disease awareness highlight important challenges in the prevention and management of obstructive lung disease in India. Multifaceted approaches are needed to address this disease burden, including understanding and lowering exposure to risk factors and improving infrastructure and resources for diagnosing and managing obstructive lung disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.