Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40880203›Full record

ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2025

Differences in the temporal patterns of occupational time on feet and sitting between homecare and nursing home workers.

Nestor Lögdal, Svend Erik Mathiassen, Jennie A Jackson, David M Hallman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nestor LögdalDepartment of Occupational Health, Psychology, and Sports Sciences, University of Gavle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0461-5294
Svend Erik MathiassenDepartment of Occupational Health, Psychology, and Sports Sciences, University of Gavle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1443-6211
Jennie A JacksonDepartment of Occupational Health, Psychology, and Sports Sciences, University of Gavle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2939-0236
David M HallmanDepartment of Occupational Health, Psychology, and Sports Sciences, University of Gavle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2741-1868

Funding

Swedish Research Council for HealthWorking Life and Welfare 019- 01257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEldercare work is physically demanding, which may contribute to high rates of sickness absence. Understanding the temporal patterns of time on feet and sitting, the latter assumed to represent recovery, and how they depend on organizational and individual factors is key to a better work organization that can effectively promote health, but this has not been studied before.

aimTo describe temporal patterns of time on feet and sitting among homecare and nursing home workers and examine their associations with setting, job demands and resources, job title, and age.

methodsSwedish homecare (n = 101) and nursing home (n = 73) workers wore accelerometers for 7 consecutive days to assess physical behaviors. Short (≤5 min), moderate (>5 to ≤30 min), and long (>30 min) bouts of time on feet and sitting were identified, with their relative distribution expressed in 5 ratios and analyzed using compositional data analysis procedures. Workers also completed a questionnaire on job organizational factors (job demands and resources) and individual factors (job title and age). MAN(C)OVA models were used to analyze differences in behaviors between eldercare settings, with organizational and individual factors being added in 2 consecutive models. Univariate analyses followed the multivariate models.

resultsHomecare and nursing home workers spent most of the workday on their feet (51.9% and 56.9%, respectively). The only statistically significant difference between settings was that homecare workers spent 30.1% less time sitting in long bouts relative to moderate and short compared to nursing home workers (P = 0.011), and this difference remained after adding covariates. Higher age was associated with more time on feet relative to sitting (P = 0.002, η2 = 0.06) and more time on feet in long bouts relative to moderate and short bouts (P = 0.001, η2 = 0.06) with medium effect sizes, as well as to more time on feet in moderate bouts relative short bouts (P = 0.011, η2 = 0.04), and less sitting in long bouts relative to moderate and short bouts (P = 0.019, η2 = 0.03) with small effect sizes.

conclusionsTemporal patterns varied by setting and age, with homecare workers sitting less in long bouts than nursing home workers, and older workers spending more time on feet than younger workers. These findings suggest that work setting and worker characteristics are associated with temporal patterns of physical behavior, although most effects were small-to-moderate and their practical relevance remain uncertain and warrants further study.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesNursing HomesSitting PositionAccelerometryAdultFemaleFootHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenTime Factorsoccupational physical activityphysical behaviorsphysical demands

Identifiers

PMID40880203
PMCPMC12463557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.