Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40880193›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2025

Duration effects on detection cues in simultaneous masking: Analysis using decision variable correlationa).

Skyler G Jennings, Kenneth S Henry, Douglas M Schwarz, Mia Brown, Levi Lundquist, Laurel H Carney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Skyler G JenningsDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Utah, 390 South, 1530 East, BEHS 1201, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7750-8396
Kenneth S HenryDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
Douglas M SchwarzDepartments of Biomedical Engineering and Neuroscience, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
Mia BrownDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Utah, 390 South, 1530 East, BEHS 1201, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.
Levi LundquistDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Utah, 390 South, 1530 East, BEHS 1201, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.
Laurel H CarneyDepartments of Biomedical Engineering and Neuroscience, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.

Funding

DEVELOPING AND TESTING MODELS OF THE AUDITORY SYSTEM WITH & WITHOUT HEARING LOSSR01DC010813 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CARNEY, LAUREL H. · 2011 to 2025
$5.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experiments involving the detection of a tone presented in noise form the basis of psychophysical estimates of auditory frequency selectivity. These estimates are central to theories of hearing and to models/algorithms for hearing aid fitting, automatic speech recognition, and digital audio compression. Despite widespread application of tone-in-noise experiments, cues used by listeners to detect the tone are debated. This study adopts a molecular psychophysics approach-decision variable correlation-to evaluate whether trial-by-trial responses are consistent with candidate decision variables, including stimulus energy and temporal envelope fluctuations. Detection thresholds were measured in normal-hearing adults for 1000 or 4000 Hz tones presented in one-third octave noise centered on the tone frequency. The tone and noise were gated simultaneously and thresholds were measured for durations of 10, 20, 50, and 100 ms. The reliability of energy-based cues was limited by incorporating a roving-level paradigm. Similarly, the use of short tones limited the reliability of envelope-based cues. Results revealed that listeners adopted a strategy that emphasized energy-based cues for detecting short-duration tones. Conversely, participants relied progressively more on envelope-based cues as tone duration increased. This finding suggests models of human psychophysics may benefit from a decision device that adjusts cue weights based on stimulus duration.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionCuesPerceptual MaskingAcoustic StimulationAdultAuditory ThresholdFemaleHumansMaleNoisePsychoacousticsTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40880193
PMCPMC13056437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.