ReviewOnline journal of public health informatics2025
Imposters, Bots, and Other Threats to Data Integrity in Online Research: Scoping Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Best Practices.
Review in Online journal of public health informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why Do Male Users Engage with Connected Sex Toys? A Latent Class Analysis of Motivational Profiles.Archives of sexual behavior · 2026Article
- Health behaviors among young adult cancer survivors and the importance of task self-efficacy.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Adolescents' and Young Adults' use of "Boost" mode in their E-cigarettes.Tobacco control · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Threats to data integrity have always existed in online human subjects research, but it appears these threats have become more common and more advanced in recent years. Researchers have proposed various techniques to address satisficers, repeat participants, bots, and fraudulent participants; yet, no synthesis of this literature has been conducted. Objective: This study undertakes a scoping review of recent methods and ethical considerations for addressing threats to data integrity in online research. Methods: A PubMed search was used to identify 90 articles published from 2020 to 2024 that were written in English, that discussed online human subjects research, and that had at least one paragraph dedicated to discussing threats to online data integrity. Results: We cataloged 16 types of techniques for addressing threats to online data integrity. Techniques to authenticate personal information (eg, videoconferencing and mailing incentives to a physical address) appear to be very effective at deterring or identifying fraudulent participants. Yet such techniques also come with ethical considerations, including participant burden and increased threats to privacy. Other techniques, such as Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart (reCAPTCHA; Google LLC), scores, and checking IP addresses, although very common, were also deemed by several researchers as no longer sufficient protections against advanced threats to data integrity. Conclusions: Overall, this review demonstrates the importance of shifting online research protocols as bots and fraudulent participants become more sophisticated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.