Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40880104›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2025

Adolescent Treatment Landscape of Depression, Suicidality, and Substance Use Disorder in the US.

Dennis Lee, Stacie B Dusetzina, Stephen W Patrick, John A Graves, Carrie E Fry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dennis LeeDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles.
Stacie B DusetzinaDepartment of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Stephen W PatrickDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
John A GravesDepartment of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Carrie E FryDepartment of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Recent trends in drug-related overdoses among adolescents have highlighted the need for mental health and substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. However, the extent of these treatment gaps is understudied. Objective: To characterize the factors associated with the diagnosis of and treatment for mental health and SUD for adolescents. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used survey-weighted descriptive statistics and χ2 tests to estimate differences in characteristics and treatment receipt and included US adolescents and young adults aged 12 to 20 years who participated in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health in 2021 and 2022. Data were analyzed from February 2024 to February 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes included the prevalence of depression and suicidality-related mental health diagnoses, SUDs, and treatment rates for both conditions. Additional measures included treatment setting, socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, and health insurance-related factors. Results: From 2021 to 2022, 13% of participants had SUD and 24% had a mental health diagnosis during the previous year (mean [SD] age, 16.0 [2.5] years; 48.4% female individuals; 6.1% Asian, 13.9% Black, 25.7% Hispanic, and 49.9% White individuals). Only 10% of participants with SUD and 51% of adolescents with mental health diagnoses received treatment for their conditions, with higher rates of treatment among adolescents with comorbid SUD and mental health diagnoses. When comparing adolescents (aged 12-17 years) and young adults (aged 18-20 years) with SUD for treatment receipt, reductions were found in any mental health treatment (63% vs 51%; P = .03) and any SUD treatment (11% vs 8%; P = .01). Moreover, these lower rates were also found in more resource-intensive treatment settings, such as inpatient mental health care (14% vs 9%; P = .02) and specialty mental health facilities (47% vs 33%; P = .003). However, adolescents with opioid use disorder were less likely to receive medication treatment (11% vs 28%; P = .02). Treatment differences were associated with socioeconomic and insurance coverage factors. Compared with adolescents, young adults with SUD experienced increased poverty rates (20% vs 26%; P = .02), uninsurance rates (5% vs 10%; P = .05), and private insurance rates (49% vs 56%; P = .02) while receiving decreased Medicaid coverage (47% vs 33%; P < .001) and government assistance (34% vs 25%; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cross-sectional survey study suggest that adolescents and young adults with SUDs rarely received treatment. Adolescents are especially vulnerable to treatment gaps once reaching young adulthood, and medications for opioid use disorder are systematically underused, especially for adolescents.

Indexed as

DepressionMental Health ServicesSubstance-Related DisordersSuicidal IdeationAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40880104
PMCPMC12397884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.