ArticleJAMA network open2025
Dried Blood Spot PCR for Detection of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Congenital cytomegalovirus screening by dried blood spot: a systematic review.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative diagnostic performance of saliva PCR and dried blood spot PCR for congenital cytomegalovirus detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Pooled it
- The Need for Universal Congenital Cytomegalovirus Screening.Pediatrics · 2026Article
- Universal Dried Blood Spot Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus: A Slovenian National Implementation Pilot.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
- The Management of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection in an Era of Universal Newborn CMV Screening.Reviews in medical virology · 2026Review
- Detection of AdenoviralInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.