ArticleJAMA network open2025
Illicit Anabolic Steroid Use and Cardiovascular Status in Men and Women.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Duration-Dependent Cardiac Effects of Anabolic-Androgenic Steroid Use in Strength-Trained Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Cardiovascular Implications of the Enhanced Games: Performance Enhancing Drugs in Competition and Recreation.Sports medicine - open · 2026Review
- Health consequences of anabolic steroids: a sexual-medicine perspective.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
- Annual Banned-Substance Review 18th Edition-Analytical Approaches in Human Sports Drug Testing 2024/2025.Drug testing and analysis · 2026Review
- Bilateral Optic Neuritis as the Initial Presentation of Acute HIV Infection in a Young Bodybuilder: A Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- The emerging landscape of performance-enhancing peptides modulating GH-IGF1 axis: bridging the gap between clinical evidence and patient self-administration.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Gender Differences in Anti-Doping Rule Violations Based on a 19-Year Data Analysis from the Serbian Anti-Doping Agency: National Study.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The illicit use of anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) is common among recreational athletes, yet studies on adverse cardiovascular outcomes, especially in female AAS users, are sparse. Objective: To assess cardiovascular status in Danish male and female recreational athletes using AAS compared with not using AAS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study in a single center in Denmark included recreational athletes aged 18 years or older who were active AAS users, previous users (defined as those who discontinued AAS use at least 3 months prior to the study), or nonusers, all recruited from fitness centers between March and December 2022. Exposure: Cumulative lifetime use of AAS. Main Outcomes and Measures: Presence of atherosclerosis (carotid, femoral, and coronary artery plaques) and cardiac function assessed by echocardiography. Linear regression was used to estimate regression coefficients for echocardiographic characteristics and logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for carotid and femoral plaques, coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores, and coronary noncalcified plaques (NCPs). Results: Of 164 participants, 80 (48.8%) were active AAS users (median age, 35 [IQR, 30-43] years; 61 men [76.2%]), 26 (15.9%) were previous users (median age, 36 [IQR, 28-51] years; 18 men [69.2%]), and 58 (35.4%) were nonusers (median age, 40 [IQR, 31-46] years; 42 men [72.4%]). Median cumulative lifetime AAS use was 2.2 (IQR, 1.2-7.2) years for active and 2.2 (IQR, 1.0-5.5) years for previous users. No group differences were observed when comparing the number of participants with femoral (active users, 15 [19.7%]; previous users, 5 [19.2%]; nonusers, 11 [20.8%]; P = .89) or carotid (active users, 24 [31.2%]; previous users, 12 [46.2%]; nonusers, 13 [24.1%]; P = .47) artery plaques or CAC scores (median score was 0 across all groups with range of 0-228 for active users, 0-800 for previous users, and 0-163 for nonusers; P = .36), whereas a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of coronary NCPs was found between active users (19 [23.8%]) and nonusers (6 [10.3%]) (P = .03). However, in confounder-adjusted logistic regression, longer cumulative lifetime AAS use was associated with higher odds of a positive CAC score (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.39; P = .001) and presence of coronary NCPs (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05-1.30; P = .004). AAS use exceeding 5 years was associated with greater severity of calcifications (n = 94; χ2 = 9.78; P = .04). Echocardiography showed that cumulative AAS use was associated with worse left ventricular (regression coefficient: 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.12; P = .002) and right ventricular (0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.13; P = .001) global longitudinal strain. Nearly all athletes (35 of 36) with more than 5 years of cumulative AAS use had ventricular mass greater than and left ventricular ejection fraction below the median of the normal range. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, cumulative lifetime AAS exposure was associated with adverse cardiovascular findings and impaired ventricular function in both sexes, and athletes with AAS exposure exceeding 5 years showed more severe calcification. The findings support measures to prevent AAS use by both men and women in recreational sports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.