ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2025
Ecotoxicological impacts of caffeine on Daphnia magna: insights from acute to chronic exposures.
Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Miniaturised Protocol for Feeding Measurements in Daphnids.Methods and protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Caffeine (CAF), a widely consumed central nervous system stimulant, has been detected in aquatic ecosystems, and several studies show that CAF affects non-target organisms. Although some ecotoxicological studies on CAF and aquatic organisms already exist, they mostly focus on marine organisms with concentrations relevant to those ecosystems. Thus, this study evaluated the ecotoxicological effects of CAF on Daphnia magna through four tests: acute exposure (48 h; 27–3000 mg/L; immobilization/mortality parameters), feeding inhibition assay evaluating immobilization/mortality parameters (24 h; 249–1000 mg/L), sub-chronic (10 days; 3.8–60 mg/L), and chronic (21 days; 4.6–35 mg/L) exposures, assessing life history parameters (age at first reproduction, fecundity, somatic growth rate, population growth rate, and reproductive output). In all assays, biochemical parameters like antioxidant defence biomarkers, lipid peroxidation, and cholinergic neurotransmission were evaluated. The results showed that CAF exposure caused feeding inhibition (EC50 = 323 mg/L), reduced somatic growth and fecundity (CAF ≥ 10 mg/L; p < 0.05), and induced changes in antioxidant defences (CAF ≥ 10 mg/L; p < 0.05) and acetylcholinesterase activity (CAF ≥ 60 mg/L; p < 0.05). These findings demonstrate that CAF induces toxic effects in D. magna, compromising key biological functions like growth, reproduction, and metabolic pathways, highlighting the need to monitor CAF residues found in aquatic environments. Moreover, these results offer critical data for environmental regulation, as the assessed parameters showed sensitivity in evaluating caffeine toxicity in freshwater organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.