Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40879931›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2025

Comment on "Association between tooth loss and geriatric syndromes in older adults: a cohort study from a rural area in eastern China".

Efsun Somay

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Efsun SomayDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, 82. Street No: 26, Bahcelievler, 06490, Ankara, Turkey. efsuner@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

I found the study by He et al. quite engaging, as it offers substantial longitudinal evidence linking dental health with various geriatric syndromes in a cohort of 1,094 individuals, specifically sarcopenia, malnutrition risk, frailty, and falls. The authors conducted rigorous clinical evaluations, including assessments of handgrip strength and body composition. They also utilized validated tools, such as the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form (MNA-SF) and the FRAIL scale. The study's findings are significant: individuals with fewer than 10 teeth or those whose tooth loss has affected their daily activities demonstrated markedly increased odds of sarcopenia (OR 1.87-3.25), malnutrition risk (OR 2.31-3.64), and frailty. The absence of proper dentures significantly exacerbated these health risks, highlighting the importance of prosthetic rehabilitation, which, while beneficial, has its limitations in fully restoring oral function. This research strongly advocates for the prioritization of comprehensive oral health assessments and accessible denture provision as essential components of elderly care. The findings are particularly relevant to this rural cohort, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions in geriatric oral health, especially in resource-constrained environments where access to dental care might be limited. To further strengthen the study's relevance and scientific rigor, I propose several constructive recommendations that could enhance the research's overall impact.

Indexed as

Tooth LossAgedAged, 80 and overChinaCohort StudiesFemaleFrailtyGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleMalnutritionOral HealthRural PopulationSarcopeniaDenture qualityEdentulismFrailtyOlder adultsProsthetic rehabilitationTooth loss

Identifiers

PMID40879931
PMCPMC12396987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.