ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026
Long-term efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in venous thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome patients not candidate to warfarin: A pilot prospective case series study.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in venous thrombotic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) are controversial. This pilot study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of DOACs in APS patients requiring oral anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE) but unsuitable for treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). We performed a prospective multi-centre case-series including APS patients with previous VTE who were receiving treatment with DOACs due to ineligibility for VKAs. Main outcomes were bleeding, arterial and recurrent venous thrombotic events and all-cause death. We included 18 patients (median age 59.6 years, 66.7% women). The antiphospholipid antibody pattern was single positivity for 33.3% patients, double positivity for 33.3%, and triple positivity for 27.8%. Only one patient had seronegative APS. Apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and edoxaban were prescribed in 44.4%, 27.8%, 16.7% and 11.1% of patients, respectively. The mean follow-up was 50.1 ± 24.1 months. During the observation period, no recurrent VTE episodes or arterial thrombotic events were recorded. Four bleedings, of which 2 major, were reported. The incidence rate of bleeding was 5.3 per 100 patient-years (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.4-13.6). No intracranial bleedings were recorded.In conclusion, our preliminary findings may suggest DOAC as possible option for patients with venous thrombotic APS unsuitable to VKAs. Although these findings are promising, larger cohort studies are needed to confirm this finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.