Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40879828›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025

Partial resection of rectum for rectal GIST by posterior approach.

Makoto Hasegawa, Wataru Sakamoto, Hiroki Yago, Takahiro Sato, Misato Ito, Takuro Matsumoto, Daisuke Ujiie, Shun Chida, Hirokazu Okayama, Motonobu Saito and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Makoto HasegawaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima city, 960-1295, Fukushima, Japan.
Wataru SakamotoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima city, 960-1295, Fukushima, Japan. ws1024@fmu.ac.jp.
Hiroki YagoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima city, 960-1295, Fukushima, Japan.
Takahiro SatoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima city, 960-1295, Fukushima, Japan.
Misato ItoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima city, 960-1295, Fukushima, Japan.
Takuro MatsumotoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima city, 960-1295, Fukushima, Japan.
Daisuke UjiieDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima city, 960-1295, Fukushima, Japan.
Shun ChidaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima city, 960-1295, Fukushima, Japan.
Hirokazu OkayamaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima city, 960-1295, Fukushima, Japan.
Motonobu SaitoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima city, 960-1295, Fukushima, Japan.
Tomoyuki MommaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima city, 960-1295, Fukushima, Japan.
Koji KonoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima city, 960-1295, Fukushima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe standard surgical treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is local resection. Colorectal GISTs, which account for 5-10% of all GISTs, tend to develop in the lower rectum, making transabdominal approaches both difficult and invasive. We perform partial resection of rectum by posterior approach for rectal GISTs. We herein present our surgical procedure of posterior approach and retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of this approach.

methodsIn this retrospective case series study from 2018 to 2023, data were collected from patients who underwent partial resection of rectum by posterior approach for rectal GIST. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, complications, prognosis and presence/absence of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) were collected.

resultsFour male patients with rectal GIST were included. The median age was 50.5 years, and all patients were male. The median operation time was 203.5 min, the median intraoperative blood loss was 30 mL, and the median initial tumor diameter was 29.5 mm. One patient underwent diverting ileostomy, and the ileostomy was closed one year after surgery. Complete pathological resection was achieved in all cases. Postoperative complications were observed in one patient: outlet obstruction of the diverting ileostomy and LARS; there were no other postoperative complications including anastomotic leakage. No recurrence was observed in the median follow-up of 33.5 months.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that posterior approach is safe, associated with a low incidence of LARS, and facilitates complete resection, making it a valuable surgical option for rectal GISTs.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsProctectomyRectal NeoplasmsRectumAdultAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomePelvic recurrencePosterior approachRectal cancerRectal GIST

Identifiers

PMID40879828
PMCPMC12397157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.