ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Partial resection of rectum for rectal GIST by posterior approach.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Key H&E morphologic features associated with preoperative misdiagnosis of presacral neoplasms: a retrospective slide re-review study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Primary Extragastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of the Dorsolateral Anorectum Resected via a Posterior Approach: A Case Report.Surgical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe standard surgical treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is local resection. Colorectal GISTs, which account for 5-10% of all GISTs, tend to develop in the lower rectum, making transabdominal approaches both difficult and invasive. We perform partial resection of rectum by posterior approach for rectal GISTs. We herein present our surgical procedure of posterior approach and retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of this approach.
methodsIn this retrospective case series study from 2018 to 2023, data were collected from patients who underwent partial resection of rectum by posterior approach for rectal GIST. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, complications, prognosis and presence/absence of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) were collected.
resultsFour male patients with rectal GIST were included. The median age was 50.5 years, and all patients were male. The median operation time was 203.5 min, the median intraoperative blood loss was 30 mL, and the median initial tumor diameter was 29.5 mm. One patient underwent diverting ileostomy, and the ileostomy was closed one year after surgery. Complete pathological resection was achieved in all cases. Postoperative complications were observed in one patient: outlet obstruction of the diverting ileostomy and LARS; there were no other postoperative complications including anastomotic leakage. No recurrence was observed in the median follow-up of 33.5 months.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that posterior approach is safe, associated with a low incidence of LARS, and facilitates complete resection, making it a valuable surgical option for rectal GISTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.