ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025
3D tomographic reconstruction in complex ventral hernias. Does it make a difference? Subjective evaluation of surgeons.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeVentral hernias are a surgical challenge, often requiring detailed imaging for surgical planning. Computed tomography (CT) is widely used in preoperative assessment, with three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions increasingly applied in surgical fields. This study aims to assess whether 3D CT reconstructions improve surgical planning compared to conventional two-dimensional (2D) CT.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted from October 2024 to January 2025, enrolling 66 surgeons with diverse experience. Participants were randomized into two groups: one assessing a complex ventral hernia using conventional CT and the other using both 2D and 3D reconstructions. Data were collected through questionnaires based on the DECOMP criteria, surgeons' perception of hernia characteristics, surgical planning, and treatment strategies. Statistical analyses, including Fisher's exact test, Chi-square test, and ROC curve analysis, were performed to compare outcomes.
resultsNo significant differences were found between the groups in the evaluation of the hernia, preoperative planning, or surgical approach. Surgeons predominantly relied on personal interpretation of CT scans rather than radiology reports. Notably, 3D reconstructions decreased the perception of hernia sac omental content (74.2% vs. 97.1%, p = 0.01). Furthermore, 3D visualization did not alter surgical decisions, including mesh selection, component separation, or preoperative techniques for loss of domain.
conclusion3D CT reconstructions do not impact the evaluation or surgical planning of complex ventral hernias compared to 2D CT. Although 3D imaging may enhance anatomical visualization, its clinical utility is unclear. Conventional 2D CT, when carefully analyzed, remains sufficient for surgical decision-making. Further research is needed to assess 3D imaging's benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40879795What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.