Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40879786›Full record

Observational studyJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2025

Systemic anticancer therapy during end of life in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. A retrospective single center study.

Simone Rota, Silvia Buriolla, Andrea Franza, Stefano Cavalieri, Cristiana Bergamini, Salvatore Alfieri, Imperia Nuzzolese, Elena Colombo, Arianna Ottini, Benedetta Lombardi Stocchetti and 4 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Simone RotaDepartment of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy. simone.rota@istitutotumori.mi.it.
Silvia BuriollaDepartment of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Andrea FranzaDepartment of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Stefano CavalieriDepartment of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Cristiana BergaminiDepartment of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Salvatore AlfieriDepartment of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Imperia NuzzoleseDepartment of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Elena ColomboDepartment of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Arianna OttiniDepartment of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Benedetta Lombardi StocchettiDepartment of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Giacomo MassaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Augusto CaraceniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Lisa LicitraDepartment of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Carlo ResteghiniDepartment of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSystemic anticancer treatments (SACTs) are used in advanced cancer stages to control disease and improve survival. However, their use at the end of life (Eol) can lead to side effects. This study aims to assess the clinical implications of SACTs near the Eol in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC).

methodsThis is an observational retrospective study conducted at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano. R/M HNSCC patients treated from 2016 to 2024 were included and classified based on the timing of their last SACT relative to death: within 30 days (Cohort 1), and more than 30 days before death (Cohort 2). Cohort 1 was further subdivided into treatments given 15–30 days (1a) or within 14 days (1b) before death. We assessed performance status, survival outcomes, time from last therapy administration to death, fatal acute adverse events, and palliative care referral rates.

resultsOne hundred fifty-five patients were evaluable for the analysis. Patients receiving last anticancer therapy within 30 days of death exhibited worse overall survival compared to those who received their last treatment earlier (HR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.48–1.00; p = 0.047). Fatal acute events occurred in 31% of cases, with respiratory failure and major bleeding as leading causes.

conclusionSACTs within 30 days of death correlates with worse prognosis and more aggressive disease. Major bleeding may be treatment-related when administered within 14 days of death. These findings emphasize the need for careful patient selection and early palliative care integration.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsHead and Neck NeoplasmsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckTerminal CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CareRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsAggressive cancer subtypesEnd of lifeHead and neck squamous cell carcinomaPalliative careSystemic anticancer treatmentTreatment timing

Identifiers

PMID40879786
PMCPMC12397045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.