ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Laparoscopic enucleation vs. pancreatectomy for small pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: long-term functional and oncological outcomes.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Textbook outcome after robotic pancreatic enucleation: a two-center evaluation of an ideal perioperative pathway.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Procedure-specific morbidity and pathologic assessment after resection of small (≤20 mm) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026Observational
- Safety and Efficiency of Various Pancreatic Enucleation Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic surgery is being increasingly used for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs). Although laparoscopic regular pancreatectomy (LRP) is frequently performed, laparoscopic enucleation (LE), a parenchyma-sparing technique, may be better in preserving pancreatic endocrine function. However, limited evidence is available regarding the long-term oncological and endocrine outcomes of these two laparoscopic methods. This study aimed to compare the surgical and prognostic outcomes and endocrine function preservation in patients undergoing LE and LRP for well-differentiated, non-invasive PanNEN.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 67 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for small (< 2 cm) well-differentiated PanNEN at Tohoku University Hospital between January 2001 and December 2021. LE was performed for small tumors (< 2 cm) located away (> 3 mm) from the main pancreatic duct. Clinical characteristics, surgical details, tumor characteristics, postoperative complications, recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and long-term endocrine function were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, and the Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical comparisons.
resultsThe median follow-up was 78.1 months for LRP and 135.4 months for LE. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the operative time, blood loss, or postoperative complications. Five-year RFS was excellent and comparable in both groups (LE, 100%, LRP 96.0%; P = 0.313). Notably, LE was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of postoperative new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) compared to LRP (5-year cumulative incidence: 9.1% vs. 43.2%; P = 0.0181). Multivariate analysis identified LRP (hazard ratio [HR] = 7.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.03-57.8; P = 0.0469), older age (> 60 years) (HR = 4.49, 95% CI 1.62-12.4; P = 0.0039), and non-functional tumor (HR = 2.78, 95% CI 1.08-7.19; P = 0.0342) as independent predictors of NODM.
conclusionGiven appropriate patient selection, LE of small well-differentiated PanNENs provides comparable oncological outcomes, perioperative safety, and superior long-term endocrine function preservation compared to LRP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.