Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Japanese steam sand bath heat therapy mediates comparable reductions in blood pressure with smaller discomfort and respiratory strains than hot water immersion and sauna.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHeat therapies such as hot water immersion, Finland saunas, and Waon therapy have been reported to reduce resting arterial blood pressure. However, hyperthermia imposes physiological and perceptual strains. To acquire a habit of heat therapy, it is ideal to develop a modality that offers therapeutic benefits with minimal strain. Here, we hypothesized that the unique Japanese traditional steam sand heat therapy lowers blood pressure with minimum physiological and perceptual strains.
methodsFourteen healthy young male adults underwent three heating procedures, each lasting 20 min: (1) steam sand bath (~ 50 °C), (2) hot water bath (~ 41 °C), or (3) sauna (~ 80 °C) in a randomized counter-balanced manner. Cardiorespiratory responses and perceptions were assessed before, during, and after each heating.
resultsCore temperature increased in the following order: hot water bath > sauna > steam sand bath (all p < 0.001 at end heating). Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide remained stable during the steam sand bath, whereas it decreased in both the hot water bath and sauna conditions (both p < 0.001 at end heating). Mean and diastolic arterial blood pressures declined at the end of recovery (all p < 0.001), with similar responses across conditions (all p > 0.39). Thermal comfort at the end of heating was lower (i.e., more comfortable) in the steam sand bath compared to the other two conditions (both p < 0.001).
conclusionWe show that the traditional Japanese steam sand bathing may provide blood pressure-lowering benefits with reduced respiratory and perceptual strains compared to hot water bath and sauna.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40879771What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.