Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40879702›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2026

Genomic analysis of radiosensitivity in breast cancer : Identifying pathological determinants and assessing genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD) for personalized dose escalation.

Pierre Loap, Irène Buvat, Alain Fourquet, Youlia Kirova, Gilles Crehange

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pierre LoapLaboratoire d'imagerie translationnelle en oncologie (LITO), U1288, Institut Curie, Inserm, Orsay, France. pierre.loap@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8863-8110
Irène BuvatLaboratoire d'imagerie translationnelle en oncologie (LITO), U1288, Institut Curie, Inserm, Orsay, France.
Alain FourquetDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Youlia KirovaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Gilles CrehangeLaboratoire d'imagerie translationnelle en oncologie (LITO), U1288, Institut Curie, Inserm, Orsay, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdjuvant radiotherapy improves recurrence-free survival in breast cancer, but intrinsic tumor radiosensitivity varies substantially, even within histologically similar subtypes. The radiosensitivity index (RSI), based on the expression of 10 genes, and the genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD) model enable personalized radiotherapy dosing. This study investigates the association between histological and molecular features and RSI, and quantifies the biological effect of radiation boost doses across conventional and hypofractionated regimens. MATERIALS AND

methodsTranscriptomic RNA-seq data from 1284 breast cancer patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA-BRCA) cohort were analyzed. RSI was calculated using a rank-based model, and GARD was computed for multiple fractionation schemes, with or without integrated boosts. Univariate and multivariate linear models identified histological and molecular correlates of RSI. EPIC (estimating the proportions of immune and cancer cells) deconvolution was performed to estimate tumor purity and the immune/stromal cell composition. Analyses were restricted to samples with ≥ 50% tumor content. Independent validation was performed in the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) cohort (n = 1981), using microarray-based gene expression data.

resultsThe median RSI in the TCGA cohort was 0.471 and was significantly lower in basal (p < 0.001) and luminal B (p < 0.001) subtypes, as well as in tumors with necrosis, inflammation, or high mitotic activity. These associations were replicated in the METABRIC validation cohort. Without a boost, 78.6% of the patients in the TCGA cohort would have achieved a GARD > 21 (associated with improved tumor control in retrospective series) with the 50 Gy/25 fractions regimen, compared to 64.8% for 40.05 Gy/15 fractions. The addition of an integrated boost significantly increased GARD values: 95.4% of patients receiving 64.4 Gy/28 fractions and 82.5% receiving 48 Gy/15 fractions achieved a GARD > 21. When stratified by molecular subtype, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes showed the greatest benefit from moderate dose escalation, with over 95% of these patients achieving GARD > 21 with a theoretical 53 Gy boost in 15 fractions. EPIC analysis revealed an inverse correlation between RSI and tumor cell content, and positive associations between RSI and specific immune or stromal components, highlighting the importance of tumor purity in interpreting RSI from bulk RNA data.

conclusionOur results support the biological relevance of RSI and GARD in breast cancer to personalize radiotherapy dose escalation in breast cancer patients and demonstrate their consistency across independent datasets and transcriptomic platforms. Tumor microenvironment composition significantly influences RSI estimation from bulk RNA-seq. Together, these findings support the implementation of personalized, biology-driven radiotherapy strategies, particularly for aggressive subtypes such as TNBC, and warrant prospective validation.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPrecision MedicineRadiation ToleranceAdultAgedCohort StudiesDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleGenomicsHumansMiddle AgedRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRadiotherapy DosageTranscriptomeBreast neoplasmsGenetic signatureGenomic-adjusted radiation doseRadiosensitivityRadiotherapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.