Observational studyEuropean radiology2026
One-year outcomes of glue prostate-artery-embolization for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Observational study in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- CIRSE Standards of Practice for the Use of Non-sclerosant Liquid Embolic Agents in IR Practice.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Prostatic artery embolization with N-butyl cyanoacrylate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a success story that merits closer examination.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Chasing Penetration: Are Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol Copolymers in PAE Solving a Problem That N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Glue Already Addressed?Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Response to Loffroy's Commentary Entitled "Chasing Penetration: Are Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol Copolymers in PAE Solving a Problem That N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Glue Already Addressed?"Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Liquid embolic agents-a practical overview.CVIR endovascular · 2026Review
- Prostatic Artery Embolization with Cyanoacrylate Glue for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Single-arm Meta-analysis of Short-term Outcomes.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2026Review
- N-butyl cyanoacrylate glue application in prostate artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review of safety and efficacy.CVIR endovascular · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess 12-month outcomes of prostate artery embolization (PAE) using N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) glue in patients with incapacitating lower-urinary-tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND
methodsRetrospective single-center observational study of patients evaluated 12 months after PAE done in 2018-2023 using methacryloxysulfolane-NBCA mixed with ethiodized oil. Glue injection was under free- or blocked-flow conditions, depending on artery size and real-time assessment of penetration. Both distal embolization and proximal prostatic-artery occlusion were achieved without filling of collaterals. The 12-month outcomes were the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and associated Quality-of-Life score (IPSS-QoL), prostate volume, International Index of Erectile Function form 5 (IIEF5), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level.
resultsA total of 186 patients with a mean age of 67.5 ± 6.0 years were included. All procedures were technically successful. Minor adverse events occurred in 35/186 (18.8%) patients. There were no major complications. At 12 months, significant improvements vs baseline were noted for the IPSS (10 ± 6.6 vs 20.1 ± 6.4, p = 0.0001), IPSS-QoL (2.2 ± 1.6 vs 5.1 ± 0.9, p = 0.0001), and prostate volume (81.1 ± 47.0 mL vs 118.1 ± 67.4 mL, p = 0.0001). The IIEF5 and PSA levels were not significantly different at 12 months vs baseline (16.2 ± 7.2 vs 15.8 ± 6.9, p = 0.814; and 4.9 ± 3.3 vs 4.8 ± 4.2, p = 0.286; respectively).
conclusionsOur data support the feasibility, safety, and sustained effectiveness at 12 months of PAE with NBCA to treat BPH-related LUTS. KEY POINTS: Question NBCA glue may have advantages over other agents for prostatic artery embolization in BPH, but data on long-term outcomes are scarce. Findings Prostatic artery embolization using glue led to significant decreases in the International Prostate Symptoms Score, quality of life score, and prostate volume at 12-month follow-up. Clinical relevance NBCA glue for prostatic artery embolization in patients with symptomatic BPH is safe and provides sustained symptom relief for at least one year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40879695What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.