Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40879667›Full record

ArticleVeterinary surgery : VS2025

Machine-learning prediction of postoperative complications after high tibial osteotomy for canine cranial cruciate ligament disease.

Daniel Low, Rhys Treharne, Scott Rutherford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary surgery : VS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel Lowfrank. Pet Surgeons, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0215-4997
Rhys Treharnefrank. Pet Surgeons, Leeds, UK.
Scott Rutherfordfrank. Pet Surgeons, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2044-3656

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop and internally validate a machine-learning algorithm, PROSPECT (Predicting Risk Of Surgical complications aftEr CCWO and TPLO), using clinical variables to predict postoperative complications in dogs undergoing high tibial osteotomy for cranial cruciate ligament disease (CrCLD). STUDY

designRetrospective multivariable prediction model development. SAMPLE POPULATION: Stifles (n = 670) and dogs (n = 555).

methodsComplication data with a minimum follow up of 28 days were collected. Clinical variables were preprocessed for machine learning and interaction features were engineered. A multioutput eXtreme Gradient Boosting model was trained on 80% of the sample to predict minor, surgical, and medical complications independently. The trained PROSPECT model was then tested on the independent test set. Model performance was evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively.

resultsComplications occurred in 134/670 (20.0%) stifles, with 50 (7.5%) minor complications, 69 (10.3%) surgical complications, and 26 (3.4%) medical complications. The PROSPECT model achieved Brier scores and accuracies of 0.06379 ± 0.009100 and 91.9% for minor complications, 0.05481 ± 0.008589 and 92.3% for surgical complications, and 0.04102 ± 0.008194 and 94.3% for medical complications.

conclusionThe PROSPECT model can predict postoperative complications accurately and in a probabilistic fashion following high tibial osteotomy for CrCLD. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Machine learning may facilitate an individualized approach to risk management with the potential to enhance patient safety and promote safer surgery.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesDog DiseasesMachine LearningOsteotomyPostoperative ComplicationsTibiaAnimalsAnterior Cruciate LigamentDogsFemaleMaleRetrospective StudiesStifle

Identifiers

PMID40879667
PMCPMC12528822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.