Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40879605›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026

Global Health Immersions in Nursing Education: Evaluating Impact and Recommendations for Programming.

Claire Honl, Katherine Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claire HonlSchool of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3893-2465
Katherine CollinsSchool of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimGlobal health immersion programming is cited as supporting nursing students' cultural competency; it is also historically grounded in colonialism. This study explored nursing students' perspectives on the benefits and challenges of global health immersions. Programming suggestions are based on student feedback and immersion literature.

designQualitative, cross-sectional.

methodsNine semi-structured interviews were conducted with nursing students who participated in global health immersions. Interviews were inductively coded for recurring themes, focusing on immersion benefits, challenges, and impact on nursing practice.

resultsParticipants reported enriched cultural humility, deepened integration into local healthcare systems, and enhanced understandings of disparities. In clinical practice, participants described being galvanised to provide culturally respectful care, strengthening communication, valuing holistic care, desiring to promote health equity, and appreciating resources. Challenges included communication barriers, ethical concerns, and insufficient preparatory guidance. Challenges and suggestions for improvement are aligned with evidence-based recommendations for ethical immersion programming.

conclusionThis study highlights the potential of immersions to advance culturally sensitive, equity-centred healthcare. It identifies areas for growth and solutions to challenges through evidence-based recommendations. Future research should invite feedback from collaborating international communities to understand programme impact and ensure mutual benefit. REPORTING

methodSRQR guidelines. PATIENT/PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public involvement in study design, conduct, or reporting.

Indexed as

Cultural CompetencyEducation, NursingGlobal HealthStudents, NursingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchYoung Adultglobal healthgraduatenursing educationundergraduate

Identifiers

PMID40879605
PMCPMC13069201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.