ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025
Participation in clinical research among racial and ethnic minority Medicare beneficiaries: Evidence from the IDEAS study.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Participation in clinical research among racial and ethnic minority Medicare beneficiaries: Evidence from the IDEAS study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionRacial and ethnic disparities in clinical research, although documented in aggregate, are poorly understood due to a lack of data on the population eligible to participate. We compared the characteristics of Medicare beneficiaries who participated in the Imaging Dementia-Evidence for Amyloid Scanning (IDEAS) study to those eligible to participate.
methodsWe used 100% Medicare claims data from 2016 to 2017 to identify IDEAS study participants and those eligible to participate.
resultsWe identified 11,480 beneficiaries in the IDEAS study sample and 3,008,067 in the eligible sample. Participants were more likely to reside in urban areas, less likely to be enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid, or a Medicare Advantage plan. Black and Hispanic participants were more likely to reside in higher-income counties and were healthier than the eligible sample. DISCUSSION: Racial and ethnic minority participants in clinical research differ from those eligible, particularly in socioeconomic and insurance characteristics, affecting generalizability. HIGHLIGHTS: In this study, we compared the characteristics of Medicare beneficiaries participating in the Imaging Dementia-Evidence for Amyloid Scanning (IDEAS) study and Medicare beneficiaries eligible to participate in the IDEAS study. We use 100% claims of Medicare beneficiaries. Hispanic and Black beneficiaries in the IDEAS study participant sample were more likely to reside in an urban area, less likely to be dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid, and more likely to reside in a county with higher income compared to the Hispanic and Black beneficiaries IDEAS eligible sample. Across racial/ethnic groups, IDEAS study participants were more likely to be enrolled in Traditional Medicare compared to the IDEAS eligible sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.