ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2025
Optimization of a molecularly defined tuberculin formulation: recombinant fusion proteins and epitope surgery.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteome microarray-guided identification of mycobacterial antigens and ELISA-based peptide mapping for improved serological detection ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Exploring alternative cytokines as potential biomarkers forFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bovine tuberculosis is an infectious livestock disease of global economic and zoonotic importance. Surveillance programs are largely dependent on the skin test that utilizes purified protein derivatives (PPDs) of tuberculin. PPDs suffer from a number of limitations regarding their production, characterization, and performance. Recently, we developed a molecularly defined tuberculin (MDT) that overcame these limitations. The MDT formulation comprises eight antigens, initially presented as seven recombinant proteins (ESAT6, CFP10, Rv3615c, Rv3020c, Rv1789, Rv3478, and Rv3810) and one 20-synthetic peptide pool representing Rv3616c; the recombinant Rv3616c could not be produced. In this paper, we describe the steps taken to simplify the MDT formulation. First, seven of the eight proteins were formulated as three recombinant fusion proteins. Second, the non-immunogenic regions of Rv3616c were identified, using overlapping peptides to probe T-cells from infected cattle. A novel variant, Rv3616c-S4, was designed and then formulated (i) as a stand-alone protein in the MDT-S4 formulation and (ii) fused to Rv1789 for use in the MDT-F formulation. These novel MDT formulations gave comparable signal strength to PPD-B in experimentally infected animals. The MDT-F, comprising only fusion proteins, performed as well as the comparative cervical tuberculin skin test, in terms of relative sensitivity (>2 mm; 96%, 95% CI 80-100, IMPORTANCE: Bovine tuberculosis is an infectious livestock disease of global economic and zoonotic importance. Surveillance programs are largely dependent on the skin test, which utilizes tuberculins. These are crude protein extracts of live bacterial cultures, which suffer from a number of limitations regarding their characterization, standardization, production, and performance. We aim to develop a skin test reagent composed of eight defined antigens that could replace the tuberculins. This study describes the refinement of this "molecularly defined tuberculin" (MDT) reagent into a fusion protein formulation comprising all eight antigens. The MDT is well defined, easily standardized, and delivers good test performance in experimentally infected, non-infected cattle and cattle sensitized to Johne's disease. The fusion protein formulation is an important step on the developmental pathway to a registered and marketable product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.