Observational studyJournal of hospital medicine2026
Hospitalized patients' health-related social needs: A comparison of screenings conducted by hospital staff and research staff.
Observational study in Journal of hospital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- How do existing HRSN assessment tools assess social needs for older adults? A systematic review.Frontiers in health services · 2026Pooled it
- Hospitalized patients' health-related social needs: A comparison of screenings conducted by hospital staff and research staff.Journal of hospital medicine · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
New policies require hospitals to identify and address patients' health-related social needs (HRSN) yet provide minimal guidance on how screening should be conducted. This observational study occurred at a large academic hospital serving a diverse population. Hospital and research staff independently screened newly admitted medical patients for six HRSNs using an instrument designed by a quality improvement team. We calculated κ statistics to assess HRSN agreement between hospital and research staff. Analysis of 413 patients revealed fair to moderate agreement between hospital and research staff screenings (κ = 0.25-0.54). Hospital staff identified fewer patients with needs related to medication affordability, housing, food, transportation, and mental health, but identified a higher proportion with needs related to the usual source of care. Hospital staff underestimate the proportion of patients with HRSN, potentially excluding patients from referral to social services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.