Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40879369›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2025

Cellulose-functionalized magnetic nanoparticle-mediated isolation of novel cellulolytic bacteria.

Jieyi Zheng, Lei Xing, Nan Zheng, Jiaqi Wang, Shengguo Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Bridging the gap:Gut microbes · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jieyi ZhengState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, , Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0008-2793-2031
Lei XingState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, , Beijing, China.
Nan ZhengState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, , Beijing, China.
Jiaqi WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, , Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8841-0124
Shengguo ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, , Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5194-8780

Funding

Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program CAAS-ZDRW202308Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System CARS-36National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFD1301000State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding 2004DA125184G2406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cellulolytic bacteria are crucial for applications in animal feeds, food processing, and bioenergy production. However, isolation of these bacteria from the microbial community has been challenging due to limitations in current methodologies. This study introduces a novel cellulose-functionalized magnetic nanoparticle-mediated isolation technique designed to enhance the recovery of cellulolytic bacteria. We hypothesized that bacteria could adhere to magnetic nanoparticles coated with cellulose, allowing selective isolation of cellulolytic strains through their cellulase activity-induced magnetic loss. The magnetic nanocomposite was synthesized and functionalized with cellulose (magnetic nanoparticle-cellulose composite [MNPC]). The anaerobic

Indexed as

BacteriaCelluloseMagnetite NanoparticlesAnimalsCattleRumenCelluloseMagnetite Nanoparticlescellulolytic bacteriaisolationmagnetic nanoparticlesrumen

Identifiers

PMID40879369
PMCPMC12542705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.