ReviewCell biology international2025
Anti-Biofouling Coatings Based on Ultra-Slippery Surfaces.
Review in Cell biology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Surface Acoustic Waves (SAWs) for Water Quality Sensor's Anti-Biofouling Application: A New Direction for Acoustic Waves.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mushroom-Derived Hydrophobins for Antifouling and Interface Preservation in Chemosensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bubble-mediated hydrogen degassing in the rumen: a theoretical hypothesis with potential implications for methane mitigation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional treatment of biofouling with toxic paints or antibiotics has significant limitations and challenges, including negative impacts on surrounding ecosystems and the emergence of resistant microbial strains. Antibiotics often prove ineffective in penetrating the dense and protective structure of biofilms, rendering traditional antimicrobial approaches less effective and leading to chronic infections. Toxic paints, while initially effective in reducing microbial colonization, contribute to long-term environmental contamination and harm non-target organisms. In contrast, novel technologies such as aerophilic surfaces, a special type of superhydrophobic surface, and liquid-infused slippery surfaces offer promising alternatives to conventional biofilm management technologies. While aerophilic surfaces create a physical barrier that inhibits biofilm formation by reducing the direct contact of aqueous media with solid surfaces, liquid-infused slippery surfaces enhance the anti-biofouling effect by maintaining a protective lubricating layer that prevents organisms from settling. These nontoxic technologies not only provide a more sustainable and effective means of combating biofilms but also minimize the environmental impact associated with conventional treatments. By leveraging the unique properties of advanced materials, we can increase the durability and effectiveness of surfaces, leading to improved outcomes in various fields, including medical devices and marine applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.