ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2025
Clinical Validation of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assays for the Rapid Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis.
Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Laboratory Evaluation of aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Mechanisms, management and prevention of anorectal sexually transmitted infections.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Laboratory detection methods for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in children: a review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) are the predominant causes of bacterial sexually transmitted diseases. While nucleic acid amplification testing (NAATs), primarily polymerase chain reaction (PCR), is regarded as the gold standard for identifying these two pathogens, it usually takes a prolonged turnaround time and requires sophisticated equipment with considerable expense. In this study, we developed novel loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assays for rapid detection (< 30 min) of GC and CT in clinical urine and swab specimens. We analysed 208 clinical samples with three different pre-treatment techniques including heating inactivation, centrifugation, and DNA extraction. LAMP results were compared with clinical results from the FDA-approved BD ProbeTec ET assay. After heating inactivation, LAMP detected merely 41% and 65% of BD-identified GC- and CT-positive samples, respectively. Introducing centrifugation as an affordable and rapid pre-treatment step increased detection rates to 81% and 91% for GC and CT, respectively. DNA extraction further enhanced the detection rates to 96% and 95% for GC- and CT-LAMP, respectively. All these LAMP assays exhibited clinical specificity of ≥ 98%, underscoring the specificity of the chosen target genes (the porA pesudogene for GC and the ftsK gene for CT). Discrepant samples were verified by real-time PCR; results were consistent with our LAMP findings. The overall LAMP performance met the WHO criteria for sensitivity and specificity for GC/CT point-of-care testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.