Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40879309›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2025

Clinical Validation of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assays for the Rapid Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis.

Yasaman Ahmadi, Yejiong Yu, Zhanfeng Cui, Wei E Huang, Monique I Andersson

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development and Laboratory Evaluation of aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Laboratory detection methods for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in children: a review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yasaman AhmadiDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4563-830X
Yejiong YuDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Zhanfeng CuiDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Wei E HuangDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1302-6528
Monique I AnderssonDepartment of Microbiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Prenetics 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) are the predominant causes of bacterial sexually transmitted diseases. While nucleic acid amplification testing (NAATs), primarily polymerase chain reaction (PCR), is regarded as the gold standard for identifying these two pathogens, it usually takes a prolonged turnaround time and requires sophisticated equipment with considerable expense. In this study, we developed novel loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assays for rapid detection (< 30 min) of GC and CT in clinical urine and swab specimens. We analysed 208 clinical samples with three different pre-treatment techniques including heating inactivation, centrifugation, and DNA extraction. LAMP results were compared with clinical results from the FDA-approved BD ProbeTec ET assay. After heating inactivation, LAMP detected merely 41% and 65% of BD-identified GC- and CT-positive samples, respectively. Introducing centrifugation as an affordable and rapid pre-treatment step increased detection rates to 81% and 91% for GC and CT, respectively. DNA extraction further enhanced the detection rates to 96% and 95% for GC- and CT-LAMP, respectively. All these LAMP assays exhibited clinical specificity of ≥ 98%, underscoring the specificity of the chosen target genes (the porA pesudogene for GC and the ftsK gene for CT). Discrepant samples were verified by real-time PCR; results were consistent with our LAMP findings. The overall LAMP performance met the WHO criteria for sensitivity and specificity for GC/CT point-of-care testing.

Indexed as

Chlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisGonorrheaMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNeisseria gonorrhoeaeNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesDNA, BacterialHumansSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsUrineDNA, BacterialChlamydia trachomatisdiagnosisLAMP assayNeisseria gonorrhoeaepoint‐of‐care testing (POCT)Sexually Transmitted Infectious

Identifiers

PMID40879309
PMCPMC12395580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.