ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Predicting the Structure-Function Relationship in Glaucoma Using a Physiological Model.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structure-function relationships of circumpapillary choroidal thickness in normal-tension glaucoma with and without high myopia.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Determine how well a physiological model-the retina-V1 (RV1) model of target detection-predicts the structure-function relationship in glaucoma. Methods: Unlike curve-fitting models, the RV1 model includes a map of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) receptive fields across the visual field (VF), enabling simulation of different patterns of RGC loss. Predicted mean sensitivity for different patterns of simulated RGC loss and predictions of different curve-fitting models were compared to 12,917 paired SITA-Standard 24-2 VFs and optical coherence tomography measurements of average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness from 4432 eyes of 2418 patients with glaucoma between 1997 and 2023. Except for one free parameter, all RV1 model parameters were fixed from a previous study that fit the model to an unrelated data set of contrast sensitivities for 43 localized achromatic stimuli. Results: Different structure-function relationships were predicted by the RV1 model for different patterns of RGC loss. Random RGC loss resulted in a mean absolute error of 2.99 dB, which was marginally but significantly smaller than 3.01 dB for ninth-degree polynomial regression-the highest degree polynomial whose coefficients could be estimated. Other patterns of simulated RGC loss, including periphery-to-fovea loss typical in glaucoma, accounted for much of the observed variance in the structure-function data. Unlike curve-fitting models, the RV1 model correctly predicted higher variance at lower dB/micron levels. Conclusions: A physiological model can account for much of the observed variance in structure-function data for glaucoma by simulating different patterns of RGC loss-this is currently not possible with curve-fitting models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.