ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Sex Distributions in the Most Frequent Autosomal Genetic Causes of Retinitis Pigmentosa.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lipid-Retinoid Metabolic Network Links Genetic Variation to Molecular Heterogeneity in Inherited Retinal Degeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore whether sex imbalances are detectable in the most frequent genetic causes of retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Methods: Databases from centers in three countries (Moorfields Eye Hospital, London; Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto; and Australian Inherited Retinal Disease Registry, Perth, Australia) were searched, quantifying numbers of male and female patients with disease attributed to variants in the six most frequently involved autosomal RP genes. Proportions of female patients (with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were calculated for each gene. Two-tailed binomial testing was performed (Bonferroni corrected threshold, P = 0.008) to investigate whether proportions differed significantly from an underlying male:female ratio of 1:1. For genes where the 95% CI did not include 50%, sex distributions were also explored in previously published cohorts. Results: Our search yielded 1454 patients with disease attributable to variants in USH2A (n = 550), RP1 (n = 277), RHO (n = 246), PRPF31 (n = 158), EYS (n = 124), and MYO7A (n = 99). Proportions of female patients (95% CI) for each gene were 46.2% (42.0-50.5%), 49.5% (43.4-55.5%), 55.3% (48.8-61.6%), 63.9% (55.9-71.3%), 39.5% (31.0-48.7%), and 42.4% (32.7-52.8%), respectively. The 95% CI did not include 50% for PRPF31 and EYS; binomial testing revealed P values of 6.24 × 10-4 and 0.025, respectively. Combining with data extracted from previously published cohorts yielded P values of 1.62 × 10-6 and 0.0084, respectively. Conclusions: We observed a significant preponderance of female patients for PRPF31-associated RP and a preponderance of male patients in those with EYS-associated RP. Our findings suggest that sex is likely to be a modifier affecting penetrance in PRPF31-associated disease and might act in the opposite direction in disease associated with EYS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.