ArticleJournal of vision2025
Color contrast adaptation and compensation in color deficiencies.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anomalous trichromacy (AT) results from a reduced spectral separation between the L and M cone photopigments. This leads to smaller differential responses in the L and M cones and thus lower sensitivity to the colors signaled by the LvsM difference. Despite this, for stimuli above threshold, many color-anomalous observers report color experiences that resemble those of color-normal individuals, suggesting some form of perceptual compensation for their sensitivity losses. The nature and sites of this compensation remain uncertain, and may reflect many levels, from early sensory mechanisms to later post-perceptual processes. To assess potential sensory-level compensation, we compared the aftereffects of adaptation to chromatic contrast in 15 color-normal and 15 color-anomalous observers (10 deutan, 5 protan). Without compensation, the same adapting contrast should produce weaker adaptation effects in anomalous observers, because the same physical adaptor is a lower multiple of their threshold sensitivity. We quantified this prediction in color-normals by rescaling the LvsM contrasts to simulate the sensitivity losses. Although protan observers showed mixed results, the deutan observers exhibited adaptation effects that exceeded the predictions based on their threshold sensitivities, indicating partial compensation for the reduced LvsM signals. These findings are consistent with a post-receptoral sensory gain in contrast processing that compensates for the weaker LvsM cone signals available to anomalous observers, and could reflect a general normalization of contrast coding to match the color gamut of the observer's environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.