ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Interventional Treatment Is an Effective Approach to Relieve Symptoms in Patients With Malignant Tracheoesophageal Fistula.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interventional Treatment Is an Effective Approach to Relieve Symptoms in Patients With Malignant Tracheoesophageal Fistula.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA malignant tracheoesophageal fistula (mTEF) is a complication of primary tumor growth or the recurrence of esophageal tumors or lung carcinoma. Patients with mTEF have lower survival and quality of life than those who do not develop this complication. Esophageal cancer (EC), a common gastrointestinal malignancy, ranks among the world's leading causes of cancer-related death. The low survival rate in patients with EC is attributed to malnutrition, repeated aspiration, and severe infection; the mean survival duration is 2-4 months after diagnosis. This study investigated the clinical characteristics of patients with EC complicated with mTEF and the efficacy of various treatment regimens.
methodsThis study was a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 51 patients with EC complicated with mTEF hospitalized at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital from February 2007 to May 2021. Patients were divided into three groups according to their treatment regimen: a traditional medical (TM) treatment group, an esophageal intervention (EI) treatment group, and an airway intervention (AI) treatment group.
resultsOf the 51 patients, 22 received TM treatment, 13 received AI, and 16 received EI. The overall median survival duration was 87 days (TM group, 42 days; AI group, 108 days; EI group, 104 days) and the overall mean survival duration was 130.1 days (TM group, 88.1 days; AI group, 153.5 days; EI group, 166.1 days). Cox regression analysis revealed that the treatment regimen was an independent predictive risk factor for increased survival 1 month after treatment in patients with EC complicated with mTEF, and most symptoms were relieved in the EI and AI groups.
conclusionsInterventional treatment of the esophagus and airway in patients with EC complicated with mTEF is an effective approach to improve symptoms and increase short-term survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.