ArticleInternational journal of cancer2025
Longitudinal patterns of penile human papillomavirus detection among Ugandan men: A prospective sampling study.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Longitudinal patterns of penile human papillomavirus detection among Ugandan men: A prospective sampling study.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a highly prevalent sexually transmitted infection, yet data on HPV dynamics in African male populations remain limited. We conducted a prospective study of 300 human immunodeficiency virus-negative, sexually active Ugandan men enrolled at circumcision and followed every 6 weeks for 6 months. Penile swabs were collected by clinical staff, and HPV DNA was detected using the Roche polymerase chain reaction-based linear array assay at six time points. We estimated both point and cumulative prevalence of any and high-risk HPV, and assessed empirical and bootstrapped absolute and relative differences to quantify bias from relying solely on baseline testing. The baseline prevalence of any HPV was 49.7%, increasing to 66.0% when cumulative results were considered. Among 27 men with swabs with amplifiable viral or cellular DNA at all six visits, 100% tested positive at least once. HPV detection was often transient: only 6.1% of men with any HPV were consistently positive at all visits. Men who were ever HPV positive reported a younger age at first sex and more sexual partners. Single-timepoint testing significantly underestimated HPV prevalence, with relative biases of 24.7% for any HPV and 40.3% for high-risk HPV. Bootstrap analyses showed that reducing absolute bias to below 5% required two visits for any HPV and three for high-risk HPV, whereas achieving relative bias below 5% required three and five visits, respectively. The results remained consistent in sensitivity analyses that excluded pre-circumcision visits. These findings highlight the limitations of cross-sectional HPV testing and emphasize the importance of repeated sampling for accurate surveillance and vaccine impact assessments in male populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.