ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2025
Restrictive and Binge-Purge OSFED Variants: Clinical Features and Comparisons With Classical Eating Disorders.
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Approved and Pipeline Pharmacological Interventions for Eating Disorders (2010-2025): 15 Years of Progress (or Lack Thereof).CNS drugs · 2026Review
- The challenges of eating out for young people with eating disorders: a thematic analysis of the perspectives of young people, parents and carers, and clinicians.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Restrictive and Binge-Purge OSFED Variants: Clinical Features and Comparisons With Classical Eating Disorders.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCurrent diagnostic nomenclature includes "atypical" eating disorders (EDs) under the term other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED). Previous studies suggest that individuals with OSFED have similar psychological and concurrent symptoms to individuals with "classical" EDs. Our study compared people with OSFED to those with classical EDs on indices reflecting ED pathology, concurrent psychological symptoms, personality traits, functional impairment, illness duration, and pretreatment motivation. We also compared OSFED variants characterized solely by restrictive eating behaviors (OSFED-R) to variants in which binge-eating and/or purging symptoms predominated (OSFED-B/P).
methodsParticipants were 836 treatment-seeking adults (185 AN-Restricting type [AN-R], 165 AN Binge-eating/purging type [AN-B/P], 276 BN, 104 OSFED-R, and 106 OSFED-B/P) starting outpatient ED treatment. Data were analyzed with generalized linear models.
resultsOverall, findings in individuals with OSFED were comparable to those in people with a "classical" ED diagnosis on self-reported measures of concurrent psychological symptoms, personality traits, functional impairment, illness duration, and treatment motivation. However, relative to people with AN-R, individuals with OSFED-R reported higher levels of psychological ED symptoms (p < 0.001). The OSFED-B/P group had even more ED-related psychological symptoms than did the OSFED-R group (p = 0.02), but did not differ from the AN-B/P and BN groups on any of our indices. DISCUSSION: Findings extend previous research, underscoring the point that OSFED syndromes have serious clinical implications, comparable to those associated with full-threshold AN and BN. Results also highlight the relevance of examining heterogeneity within the OSFED category in function of a restrictive vs. binge/purge distinction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.