Observational studyCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Breast Cancer Survivors: An Exploratory Observational Study Using the French Nationwide Health Care Database Sample.
Observational study in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Breast Cancer Survivors: An Exploratory Observational Study Using the French Nationwide Health Care Database Sample.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCatheter ablation is a key treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). This procedure is clearly identifiable in French medical-administrative databases and can be used as a surrogate for symptomatic patients with drug-refractory or symptomatic paroxysmal AF forms. Breast cancer (BC) patients have an increased risk of AF, but knowledge about AF forms treated by ablation is limited.
aimsBased on a representative cohort of BC patients from the French National Health Databases, we aimed to assess the occurrence of AF catheter ablation in these patients, compared to the general population.
methodsPatients with a first diagnosis of BC between 2008 and 2018 and followed for at least 1 year until 2019 were eligible. The incidence rates of AF ablation among BC patients were compared to those in the general population by estimating a standardized incidence ratio (SIR). A competing risk survival model was used to evaluate the occurrence of AF ablation in BC patients treated with or without radiotherapy (RT) (subdistribution Hazard Ratio-sdHR).
resultsWe included 3667 patients (78% with RT). Overall, 16 cases underwent AF ablation, whereas 8.3 cases were expected in the general population, resulting in a significant SIR of 1.93 [1.10-3.00] (p < 0.05). After a mean follow-up of 6.6 years, the cumulative incidence of AF ablation at 5 years was 0.14% [0.05-0.35] in the RT group and 0.47% [0.13-1.31] in the non-RT group, with no significant difference in the age-adjusted survival analysis (sdHR = 0.65 [0.21-2.01]).
conclusionsOur exploratory study revealed that BC patients had a twofold greater rate of first AF ablation than the age-comparable general population, without a link with RT. These results should be interpreted cautiously because of the limited size of the study population and the differing characteristics between the RT and non-RT groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.