ArticleEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2025
Sex-specific prognostic value of automated epicardial adipose tissue quantification on serial lung cancer screening chest computed tomography.
Article in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Increased epicardial adipose tissue area and radiodensity in sarcopenic obesity.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- Epicardial adipose tissue signatures in Asian coronary artery disease: Insights from cardiac CT.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Genetic Links Between Cancer and Coronary Atherosclerosis: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis.Human mutation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsEpicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is a metabolically active fat depot associated with coronary atherosclerosis and cardiovascular (CV) risk. While EAT is a known prognostic marker in lung cancer screening, its sex-specific prognostic value remains unclear. This study investigated sex differences in the prognostic utility of serial EAT measurements on low-dose chest computed tomography (CT). METHODS AND
resultsWe analysed baseline and 2-year changes in EAT volume and density using a validated automated deep-learning algorithm in 24 008 heavy-smoking participants from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). Sex-stratified multivariable Cox models, adjusted for CV risk factors, body mass index (BMI), and coronary artery calcium (CAC), assessed associations between EAT and all-cause and CV mortality [median follow-up 12.3 years (IQR: 11.9-12.8), 4668 (19.4%) all-cause deaths, 1083 (4.5%) CV deaths]. Women (n = 9841; 41%) were younger, with fewer CV risk factors, lower BMI, fewer pack-years, and lower CAC than men (all P < 0.001). Baseline EAT was associated with similar all-cause and CV mortality risk in both sexes [max. aHR women: 1.70; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-2.55; men: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.40-2.40, P-interaction = 0.986]. However, 2-year EAT changes predicted CV death only in women (aHR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.37-2.49; P < 0.001), and showed a stronger association with all-cause mortality in women (aHR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.31-1.77) than in men (aHR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.13-1.40; P-interaction = 0.041).
conclusionIn this large lung cancer screening cohort, serial EAT changes independently predicted CV mortality in women and were more strongly associated with all-cause mortality in women than in men. These findings support routine EAT quantification on chest CT for improved sex-specific cardiovascular risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.