ArticlePsychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology2025
Interventional Psychiatry and Emerging Treatments for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): A Systematic Review.
Article in Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scoping review: ketamine or esketamine when used to assist psychotherapy or in combination with psychotherapy for the management of depression in adults.Npj mental health research · 2026Article
- Post-traumatic stress disorder.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a severe, often difficult-to-treat condition, highlighting the need for innovative therapies. Interventional treatments, including neuromodulation, rapid-acting pharmacotherapies such as intravenous ketamine (IV-KET) and esketamine (ESK), and emerging psychedelic-assisted psychotherapies, offer promising solutions. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy, safety, and future research priorities of these treatments for PTSD. Methods: A search strategy was implemented across 3 electronic databases. Peer-reviewed articles written in English that focused on interventional psychiatry treatments for adult patients with PTSD were included. Results: The systematic review encompassed 94 studies, including 39 on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), 8 on IV-KET, 3 on intranasal esketamine (IN-ESK), 4 on intravenous ketamine (IV-KET) assisted therapy (KET-AT), 1 on esketamine (ESK) assisted therapy (ESK-AT), and 14 on 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine assisted therapy (MDMA-AT). Randomized controlled trials demonstrated response rates of 12.5%-80% for TMS, 17%-67% for IV-KET, and 50%-87% for MDMA. Additional treatments reviewed included Electroconvulsive Therapy, transcranial direct current stimulation, and other pharmacological and neurostimulation treatments. Most treatments were well tolerated, with only mild, transient adverse effects. Conclusions: This review highlights the heterogeneity in efficacy, safety, and tolerability across neuromodulation and pharmacologic treatments for PTSD. Variability in response rates reflects differences in patient populations, protocols, and comorbidities. While repetitive TMS, IV-KET, ESK, KET-AT, and MDMA-AT show symptom improvement, sustained efficacy varies, underscoring the need for maintenance strategies. Although direct evidence on stage-specific approaches is limited, these methods, guided by neuroscience-based nomenclature, may improve therapeutic precision, especially in complex cases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.