Observational studyEuropean heart journal2025
Sudden cardiac death in newly diagnosed non-ischaemic or ischaemic cardiomyopathy assessed with a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator: the German nationwide SCD-PROTECT study.
Observational study in European heart journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06883383 (Data Analysis and Evaluation of the Incidence of Life-threatening Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Cardiomyopathies of NICM or MI/CAD Origin PROTECTED from SCD by a WCD), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Data Analysis and Evaluation of the Incidence of Life-threatening Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Cardiomyopathies of NICM or MI/CAD Origin PROTECTED from SCD by a WCD
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Wearable cardioverter defibrillator for transient arrhythmic risk and sudden cardiac death prevention: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis.Open heart · 2025Pooled it
- Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Patients at Transient Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death: State of the Art and Contemporary Clinical Evidence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The 90-day blind spot: A surgical imperative after Kuehn and colleagues.JTCVS techniques · 2026Article
- Incidence, analysis and risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in individuals with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy.ESC heart failure · 2026Observational
- Prevalence and Recovery of Arrhythmia-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure Using a Wearable Defibrillator: A Real-World Cohort Study.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Article
- Sudden cardiac death risk in the early vulnerable phase of heart failure: clarifying the SCD-PROTECT findings.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: A Bridge to Decision, Recovery, and Advanced Therapies.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Evaluation and management of recent onset cardiomyopathy in the current era of heart failure therapeutics: a clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Heart Rate Threshold Settings for Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Wearable Cardioverter-defibrillators.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2026Article
- Cost-utility analysis of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator in high-risk post-myocardial infarction patients in the Spanish healthcare system.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsPatients with newly diagnosed non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) or myocardial infarction/coronary artery disease (MI/CAD) face an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) during the early phase of guideline-recommended medical therapy initiation and up-titration. Aim is to evaluate the risk in this population by assessing sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) due to ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF).
methodsAll patients in Germany who received a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) between December 2021 and May 2023 were enrolled in the observational multicentre SCD-PROTECT study (NCT06883383). The primary outcome was the incidence of SCA due to sustained VT/VF, measured by appropriate WCD-delivered treatments, and reported as events per 100 patient-years with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Secondary outcomes included inappropriate WCD treatments, all-cause mortality, adverse events, adherence to WCD use, and heart failure medication patterns.
resultsIn this cohort of 19 598 patients, the mean age (±standard deviation) was 58.6 ± 13.7 years for those with NICM and 64.2 ± 10.6 years for patients with MI/CAD. Female patients accounted for 23.8% of the NICM and 16.3% of the MI/CAD group. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at study start was 26.9 ± 10.3% for NICM and 28.4 ± 8.0% for MI/CAD patients. The incidence rate of first appropriate treatment by WCD in NICM patients and MI/CAD patients was 6.10 (95% CI 5.31-7.00) and 8.64 (95% CI 7.41-10.05) events per 100 patient-years, respectively. Overall incidence density for all appropriate treatments was 8.53 (95% CI 7.36-9.88) and 14.98 (95% CI 12.69-17.65) per 100 patient-years in the respective groups. Improvement in LVEF to >35% was observed in 53.5% of NICM patients and 51.7% of MI/CAD patients over a mean of 65.9 ± 43.8 days. 36.2% of patients were implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator at the end of WCD use. Total mortality was 0.8%. Inappropriate shocks occurred in 0.5% of patients.
conclusionsThe SCD-PROTECT study highlights a substantial risk of SCA due to VT/VF during the early phase of guideline-recommended medical therapy optimization in patients with newly diagnosed reduced LVEF, regardless of ischaemic or non-ischaemic origin. The WCD provided SCD protection, the LVEF could improve to >35% in the majority of these patients and can therefore serve as risk stratification across both aetiologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.