ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Contemporary Resource Use and Costs Among Patients With Medically Managed Severe Aortic Stenosis: Results From a US National Claims Database.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structural heart disease screening using artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram and novice handheld cardiac ultrasound: a cost analysis.European heart journal open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who are managed medically have a poor prognosis. No contemporary studies have examined resource use and costs associated with medical management for severe AS.
methodsUsing the Optum Market Clarity Database, which links electronic health records with cost and use data, we identified patients with documented severe AS between 2016 and 2020 who were eligible for aortic valve replacement but did not undergo treatment within 1 year following diagnosis. Outcomes included health care resource use and costs during the 4-year period following the initial diagnosis. Fine-Gray competing risk models estimated use rates, and the Bang-Tsiatis method quantified use and costs while accounting for censoring.
resultsOver the study period, 6892 patients presented with severe AS, of whom 3334 (48%) were managed medically and 2812 (41%) were similar (based on propensity matching) to those who underwent aortic valve replacement. Over 4 years of follow-up, these patients experienced an average of 1.99 hospitalizations, 1.33 of which were related to a cardiovascular condition. Total costs (including hospitalizations, outpatient care, and pharmacy services) were $126 638 per patient, of which $56 032 was for inpatient care, $31 603 was for outpatient care, and $21 160 was for pharmacy services.
conclusionsIn contemporary practice, despite the availability of effective treatment, many patients with severe AS do not undergo aortic valve replacement within the year after diagnosis. These patients with severe AS who are managed medically experience high health care-related resource use and costs. Further research is needed to identify factors associated with lack of timely aortic valve replacement and to address barriers to treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.