SynthesisEuropean heart journal2026
First trimester maternal infections and offspring congenital heart defects: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European heart journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seroprevalence ofPublic health challenges · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Review
- Exploring Breastfeeding Practices and Obstacles Among Mothers With and Without Congenital Heart Disease.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Is maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first trimester associated with congenital heart defects?Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsMaternal infections have been proposed to play a role in the development of congenital heart defects (CHD). This study aims to synthesize contemporary evidence on the association between first-trimester maternal infection and risk of offspring CHD.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO number: CRD42024523638) used Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies investigating first-trimester maternal infection and offspring CHD, published up until 30 September 2024. Human studies with a minimum of 50 cases were eligible. Inverse variance weighted random-effects models were conducted to pool estimates and stratify associations by infection type and heart defect type.
resultsA total of 30 studies (24 case-control, 3 cohort, and 3 cross-sectional studies) with 1 732 295 pregnancies were identified. Studies assessed maternal infectious status through self-reported questionnaires (n = 20, 66.7%), laboratory testing (n = 7, 23.3%) or medical records (n = 3, 10.0%). Overall, any first-trimester maternal infection was associated with higher risk of CHD in offspring, with a pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.63 (1.41, 1.88). Among specific types of infection, rubella virus, coxsackievirus, respiratory infections, and influenza presented higher risks of offspring CHD, with ORs (95% CI) of 2.78 (2.08, 3.72), 1.57 (1.12, 2.19), 1.57 (1.25, 1.96), and 1.50 (1.20, 1.87), respectively. Studies that reported associations by individual subtype of CHD relied on a comparatively modest number of cases. Pooled ORs for exposure to any first-trimester infection were 1.59 (1.16, 2.20) for ventricular septal defects, 1.55 (1.21, 1.99) for atrioventricular septal defects, and not statistically significant for other subtypes.
conclusionsFirst-trimester maternal infections are associated with increased risk of offspring CHD and appear to extend beyond infections commonly tested for during routine pregnancy screening. Larger-scale studies are warranted to confirm these findings using laboratory antibody testing and explore underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.