ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2025
Educational technologies on signs of gestational risk and/or labor for pregnant women: a scoping review.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of internet-based supportive intervention on knowledge, pregnancy stress, fear of childbirth, and pregnancy outcomes in primiparas.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo map educational technologies on signs of gestational risk and/or labor developed or used to guide pregnant women in the context of Brazilian prenatal care.
methodScoping review conducted in accordance with JBI with searches performed in the following databases: Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, BDENF, BDTD, and Google Scholar, without time restriction. Data selection and extraction in independent stages by pairs, and narrative synthesis according to the PAGER model.
resultsTwenty-one studies were included, which described 18 technologies: 10 digital (55.5%), 8 printed (44%), and 1 audiovisual (5.5%). The majority (n = 13; 72.2%) approached the signs in a complementary way. There was a predominance of resources with accessible language, instructive elements, and the involvement of Nursing in their design. Thematic, methodological, and geographical gaps were observed, especially in the exclusive focus on signs of gestational risk, diversity of participants, and use of realistic images.
conclusionMapped technologies highlight important advances, as well as the need to develop more specific, inclusive, and clinically validated tools. Such resources can qualify prenatal practices in Nursing and health and improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.