ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025
Prevalence and characteristics of community-dwelling older adults using mobility devices: a cross-national comparison between the United States and China.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mobility disability is a significant global issue, particularly affecting older adults in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where access to mobility devices and national statistics on their use is limited. Additionally, research on mobility device usage often overlooks cross-national and cultural perspectives. This study aims to address this gap by comparing mobility device usage and associated characteristics among community-dwelling older adults in the United States and China, using harmonized, nationally representative data from the 2015 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) and the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). U.S. older adults exhibited a higher prevalence of mobility device use than those in China (22.2% vs 16.3%, P < .001), particularly in the use of walkers (9.9% vs 0.5%, P < .001) and wheelchairs (5.0% vs 1.9%, P < .001). In both countries, older mobility devices users were significantly more disadvantaged than non-users (Ps < .001). The sensitivity analysis further reveals that U.S. users were more likely to be obese with a higher burden of chronic diseases, while Chinese users were more likely engaged in work and caregiving tasks rather than recreational activities (Ps < .001). These findings underscore the widespread disadvantages faced by older mobility devices users in community settings, highlighting the global needs for targeted supports. This article is part of a Special Collection on Cross-National Gerontology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.