Trial reportCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2025
Effect of Health Education on Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake and Knowledge among Target Women in Addis Ababa: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health education can improve cervical cancer screening uptake; however, evidence from randomized controlled trials in the general population of Addis Ababa is limited. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of health education on screening uptake and knowledge among women aged 30 to 49 years in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 1,300 women who had never been screened before. The intervention group received home-based health education about cervical cancer, supplemented by brochures. The χ2 test, independent sample t test, and paired t tests were used to assess pre- and pos-tintervention differences. The impact of the intervention was measured using the differences-in-differences approach. Three months after the intervention, 1,154 (88.8%) were interviewed. Screening uptake was significantly higher in the intervention group, with 241 (41.8%) of women screened compared with 93 (16.1%) in the control group. After the intervention, awareness increased by 42.2%, knowledge of symptoms increased by 23.1%, knowledge of risk factors increased by 15.2%, positive attitudes improved by 26.7%, and overall knowledge increased by 19.5% among the intervention group, indicating that the change is statistically significant. The differences-in-differences analysis indicated that 51% of the change in overall knowledge was due to the intervention. Age, occupation, and income were significantly associated with the uptake of screening, whereas the lack of time was a common barrier. Structured home-based education significantly increases cervical cancer knowledge and screening uptake. Scaling up home-based health education can significantly improve screening uptake. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Cervical cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality among women in Ethiopia. Increasing awareness, improving access to screening, and promoting timely preventive interventions are critical to reducing the disease burden and increases life saving among women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.