ReviewCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2025
Contemporary Status and Frontiers of Cervical Cancer Screening in the United States.
Review in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cervical cancer screening and its implementation have evolved tremendously since the first method, cytology using the Papanicolaou stain, was introduced in the 1950s. New screening methods, such as human papillomavirus testing, have been discovered, and evidence-based changes have been made to official screening guidelines set forth by various US organizations. With the advent of a human papillomavirus vaccine in 2006 and with more recent research into populations carrying disparate burdens of cervical disease, the effectiveness of current cervical cancer screening programs is being called into question as the disease incidence has not decreased as expected in the past 20 years. This review highlights where cervical cancer screening in the United States started, the current clinical methods, and promising developments on the frontiers of screening research to introduce new screening options or improve current screening programs and outcomes. We also highlight certain population factors that hinder effective screening in high-risk groups, based on research aimed at ensuring that population-wide screening continues to be an effective strategy for reducing cervical cancer incidence and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.