ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026
Weight cycling and cancer risk in the Sister Study.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Weight cycling, when weight is repeatedly lost intentionally and then regained, may perturb biological processes that could influence cancer development. However, results from epidemiologic studies of weight cycling are mixed and provide no clear answer as to whether this behavior alters cancer risk. We examined the association of weight cycling and cancer incidence among 45 004 women enrolled in the Sister Study (2003-2009) and followed through October 12, 2020. Weight cycling was defined using baseline responses about the number of times ≥20 pounds (9 kg) was lost and then regained. Multivariable-adjusted hazards ratios and 95% CIs for all cancers and 5 individual cancers (breast, endometrial, ovarian, colorectal, and kidney) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. Weight cycling was not associated with an increased risk of any cancer after bodyweight was adjusted for and was inversely associated with risk of all cancers (HR 6 + episodes 0.89, 95% CI, 0.80-0.97; P-trend < .01) and breast cancer (HR 6 + episodes 0.82, 95% CI, 0.69-0.97; P-trend < .01). The inverse trend for breast cancer was only seen in obese and in postmenopausal women. These findings suggest that weight cycling, independent of bodyweight, does not increase cancer risk and, for breast cancer, is associated with decreased risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.