ArticleBritish journal of haematology2025
Outcomes following exposure to drug interactions with ibrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drug Safety and Polypharmacy Signals in Ibrutinib-Treated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma: Age- and Sex-Specific FAERS Analysis of CYP3A Modifier and Antithrombotic Co-Exposure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Outcomes following exposure to drug interactions with ibrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ibrutinib is metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and poses challenges with drug interactions. We conducted a population-based cohort study of Ontario residents aged ≥66 years who initiated ibrutinib for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) to evaluate the frequency of potential drug interactions involving moderate/strong CYP3A inhibitors and inducers and their association with overall survival (OS). Secondary analyses employed a nested case-control design examining hospitalizations for haemorrhage or infection as potential markers of ibrutinib toxicity. Among 642 ibrutinib recipients (median age 74 years, 34.4% female), 70 (10.9%) received a concomitant CYP3A inducer while 404 (62.9%) received a concomitant CYP3A inhibitor. In the primary analysis, we found no association between death (n = 162) and concurrent use of either moderate/strong CYP3A inducers or inhibitors. In secondary analyses, 86 patients (13.4%) were admitted to hospital for bleeding and 287 patients (44.7%) for infection. Receipt of moderate/strong CYP3A inhibitors was associated with an increased odds of hospitalization for infection (odds ratio 2.88, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.29-6.43) but not haemorrhage. Among older patients receiving ibrutinib for CLL, concomitant use of CYP3A-modulating drugs is common. We found no association between use of interacting drugs and OS, but CYP3A inhibitors were strongly associated with hospitalization for infection, underscoring the importance of pharmacovigilance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.