Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40878617›Full record

ArticleIntegrative zoology2026

To Share or Not to Share: Food Sharing in Wild Azure-Winged Magpie (Cyanopica cyanus).

Yijin Du, Pu Yang, Jiale Peng, Chenya Wang, Sen Song, Jiani Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative zoology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yijin DuCollege of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8564-1250
Pu YangCollege of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Jiale PengSchool of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Chenya WangSchool of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Sen SongSchool of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Jiani ChenCollege of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32070445Science and Technology Projects of Xizang Autonomous Region, China XZ202501ZY0018STI2030-Major Project 2021ZD0204101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food sharing is very common in the animal kingdom. Despite extensive research, the mechanisms underlying food sharing remain debated. Moreover, the majority of studies on food sharing in non-human animals have been conducted under controlled environments. The natural behavioral characteristics and ecological factors influencing the natural selection of food sharing are still not well understood. In this study, we introduce a method to examine food-sharing behaviors in wild birds within their natural habitat. Using two types of feeders-one permitting food sharing with conspecifics and the other providing exclusive access to food-along with infrared cameras to record feeder-triggering events, we found that azure-winged magpies did not exhibit proactive food-sharing behaviors. However, they did exhibit passive food-sharing behaviors under conditions of low food availability. Consistent with the harassment-avoidance hypothesis, the birds prioritized the sharing feeders to decrease harassment from food snatching when food was limited. These findings suggest that food sharing is likely shaped into a passive behavioral pattern under limited resources conditions, which induce conflicts within social groups. This context-dependent strategy may effectively reduce harassment costs, optimize individual access to resources to maximize individual benefits, and potentially enhance the survival of other group members.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorPasseriformesSocial BehaviorAnimalsazure‐winged magpiecooperative mechanismsfood sharingharassmentprosociality

Identifiers

PMID40878617
PMCPMC13362278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.